Closed rescue station is hard to stop the scandal-acbel

"Closed" relief stations to prevent scandal of the original title: "closed" relief stations to prevent scandal – watchers enough money and detailed provisions will stop the relief station "scandal" broke out, the reason is the lack of transparency, supervision, because this is a closed area a few people say. Recently, a video transmitted by the Shenzhen rescue workers assaulted the street children has aroused public concern. 3 days, Shenzhen city rescue station had responded, after investigation of video is true, someone beat children has removed processing workers. Shenzhen aid station said it will sincerely accept criticism from netizens, and will conduct an internal review on this issue and reflect on the problems in the work. The beatings were removed, and the case alone gave the public an account of the case, but the scandal, like the death of a starving teenager in Henan, Nanyang, was hardly satisfactory. Why can’t the rescue station be separated from the scenes of beatings and deaths? Why should a good and warm rescue station be used to such scandals like that? Some people say, or because the punishment is not enough, so only once committed recidivism. This is partly true, partly because of the lack of attention from the society to the relief stations. In other words, the relief station is a relatively closed circle, the people rarely come out, the outside people rarely go to understand, so that it has a "run its own way" of capital. We always like to say absolute power leads to absolute corruption, in fact, for the closed rescue station in the rescuer, the staff master what is not absolute power? Is the Savior, they lack the complaint channels, not to pick and choose the right basic necessities of life; more importantly, they don’t realize they have what kind of rights. An indisputable fact is that staying at a relief station to the old and infirm people, mostly because of various reasons, they stray away from the family, since, far away from the homeland, it must be all the well-being of the world. When a vagrant is at the bottom of the society, he can also think of maintaining his own interests, and also thinking of complaining Looking back at the tragedy of the rescue station, it is found that there is hardly any malignant incident that breaks into the public’s eye, which is brought out by the rescuer himself. Make a comparison not appropriate, Shenzhen rescue station staff beaten homeless children things, actually and school teachers beat students. The essence is not much different; but who knows, in the current social atmosphere, the teacher beating students "risk", is much larger than the rescue station staff beaten street children, because students have the consciousness and way of claiming rights, authorities and parents have been glued to the relief stations, few people. Since it is a closed space, it is only inevitable that the people who live in it can do things without restraint. For example, last year, Xi’an, Changan District, the elderly death, the old man is in the rescue station, but when the family came, the rescue station staff looked at photos 4

“封闭”的救助站难以杜绝丑闻   原标题:“封闭”的救助站难以杜绝丑闻   ■ 观察家   充足的钱与详细的规定都挡不住救助站“丑闻”的爆发,那原因就只能是,缺乏透明的监督,因为这是一个鲜有人过问的封闭地带。   近日,网络上传播的一则关于深圳市救助站工作人员殴打流浪儿童的视频引起公众关注。3日,深圳市救助站就此事回应道,经调查视频属实,涉事殴打儿童的护工已作除名处理。深圳市救助站方面表示会诚恳地接受网友批评,就此事将进行内部检讨,深刻反省工作中存在的问题。   殴打者被除名,单从个案而言,这个结果,算勉强给了公众一个交代;但是,如果联想到诸如河南南阳少年饿死救助站这样的丑闻,就让人难言满意了。为什么救助站总离不开殴打、死亡这些谁也不愿看到的景象呢?为什么理应体现良善与温暖的救助站,总是惯于爆出这样那样的丑闻呢?   有人说,还是因为惩处不够,所以才一犯再犯。这只是说对了部分原因,最根本的原因还在于社会对救助站缺少关注。或者说,救助站是个相对封闭的圈子,里面的人鲜有出来的,外面的人鲜有进去了解的,所以,才使其有了“我行我素”的资本。   我们总喜欢说绝对的权力导致绝对的腐败,其实,对于封闭的救助站中的被救助者来说,工作人员掌握的何尝不是绝对的权力呢?而被救助者,他们缺乏投诉的渠道,没有对衣食住行“挑三拣四”的权利;更重要的是,他们压根就意识不到自己拥有什么样的权利。   一个不争的事实是,呆在救助站里的人,以老弱病残者居多,他们因为各种原因流浪在外,既然远离家人、远离故土,那一定会饱尝人间冷暖。当一个流浪者身处社会最底层的时候,还能想到要去维护自己的利益,还能想到去投诉?仔细回想一下有关救助站的悲剧就会发现,几乎没有一起闯入公众视线的恶性事件,是被救助者自己捅出来的,基本都是旁观者或家人因为各种原因偶然揭出的。   做个不恰当的比较,深圳救助站工作人员殴打流浪儿童的事情,其实和学校里的老师殴打学生的事情,本质上并无太大不同;但谁都知道,以当下的社会氛围,老师殴打学生的“风险”,要远远大于救助站工作人员殴打流浪儿童,因为学生有主张权利的意识和途径,主管部门和家长也一直紧盯着,救助站则少有人过问。   既然是封闭的空间,那么身处其中的人,不受约束地做事,就只能是一种必然。比如,去年西安长安区老人死亡事件,明明老人就在救助站里,但家属找来的时候,救助站工作人员却看着照片笃定地告诉家属没见过,假如平日里无数双眼睛盯着,悲剧又何至于发生呢?   我始终觉得,现今这个状况中,政府关于救助站的财政投入,其实是不少的;日常操作规范,如何接收人员,如何配合寻找家人,也都有详细的规定,然而,充足的钱与详细的规定都挡不住“丑闻”的爆发,那原因就只能是,因为缺乏透明的监督,因为这是一个鲜有人过问的封闭地带,所以才有人敢于藐视一切规则,进而胡来乱来。   救助站要减少丑闻,其实并不在于撤掉几个站长,开除几个临时工,如果不能打破这种封闭的生态,再多的规定、再严厉的追责,其实都抵挡不住丑闻的频频爆发。所以,只有阳光照耀进来,加强公开与监督,相关部门对属于“底层人”的空间投射足够的关注,才真的有可能彻底杜绝丑闻。   □曹旭刚(媒体人) 责任编辑:黄睿 SN224相关的主题文章: